Drawing for BAD MONKEY

USPTO serial 87254070

BAD MONKEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAD MONKEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

JESS M. COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Popcorn and flavoured popcornACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Mar 7, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 6, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 24, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 22, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 22, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 22, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Mar 15, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 19, 2017LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN
Oct 17, 2017LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Sep 13, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 5, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance