USPTO serial 87262686
PROSERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2018
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with PROSERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Arnold Jr.
Patrick J. Arnold Jr. MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTD.500 W. MADISONSUITE 3400CHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of industrial chains and sprockets | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
| 040 | Assembly of chains and sprockets to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
| 041 | Providing training concerning industrial chain mechanics, chain maintenance, chain design, and chain installation | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
| 042 | Testing, analysis, and evaluation services for industrial chains, sprockets and machines in which chains and sprockets are utilized relating to material and environment characteristics, system throughput requirements, existing design performance, historical performance of components, wear on chains and sprockets, component failure analysis, and loading and cycle calculations; inspection of chain and sprocket systems in operation and providing reports on the results of the inspection; providing on-line, non-downloadable software for tracking the performance and life cycles of chains and sprockets | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Tsubaki Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Tsubaki Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROSERVICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 7, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 9, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |