USPTO serial 87263716
VIO-7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLLAND, JAMI ELENA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIO-7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MACEDONIA, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcella Ballard
MARCELLA BALLARD VENABLE LLPP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic preparations, namely, skin tanning enhancers that provide fragrance; skin tanning enhancers in the nature of skin gels, cosmetic preparations, creams, lotions, and moisturizers for accelerating, coloring, and enhancing tans; and skin tanning enhancers in the nature of non-medicated skin care preparations; Skin tanning preparations, namely, skin tanning enhancers that provide fragrance; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Indoor sun tanning preparations; Lip balm; Self-tanning preparations; Skin bronzer; Skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans; Sun tan gel; Sun tan lotion; Sun tan oil; Sun-tanning oils; Sun-tanning oils and lotions; Sun-tanning preparations; Suntan creams; Tanning and after-sun milks, gels and oils; Tanning creams; Tanning gels; Tanning milks; Tanning oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |