USPTO serial 87298024
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Shenzhen, CN
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Alcohol free wine; Ale; Aloe juice beverages; Aloe vera drinks; Aloe vera juices; Aperitifs, non-alcoholic; Beer making kit; Beer-based coolers; Bottled drinking water; Brunswick ale; Cider, non-alcoholic; Club soda; Cocktails, non-alcoholic; Coffee-flavored ale; Coffee-flavored beer; Coffee-flavored soft drinks; Cola; Concentrates and powders used in the preparation of energy drinks and fruit-flavored beverages; Concentrates for making fruit drinks; Concentrates for making fruit juices; Concentrates for making soft drinks; Concentrates used in the preparation of soft drinks; Concentrates, syrups or powders for making soft drinks or tea-flavored beverages; Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of sports and energy drinks; Cream soda; De-alcoholised beer; Dry ginger ale; Energy drinks; Flavored beers; Flavored enhanced water; Flavored waters; Frozen carbonated beverages; Fruit drinks; Fruit flavored drinks; Fruit flavored soft drinks; Fruit flavoured carbonated drinks; Fruit juice; Fruit juice bases; Fruit punch; Fruit-based soft drinks flavored with tea; Grape juice; Grape must; India pale ales (IPAs); Juice base concentrates; Kvass; Lager; Lithia water; Malt beer; Malt liquor; Malt syrup for beverages; Mineral water; Mum; Non-alcoholic beer; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; Non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic cocktail bases; Non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; Non-alcoholic cordials; Non-alcoholic drinks, namely, energy shots; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Non-alcoholic malt beverages; Non-alcoholic malt coolers; Non-alcoholic sparkling fruit juice beverages; Pale beer; Pilsner; Pop; Porter; Powders used in the preparation of coconut water beverages; Powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; Root beer; Semi-frozen carbonated beverages; Smoothies; Soft drinks flavored with tea; Soft drinks, namely, sodas; Sorbets in the form of beverages; Sports drinks; Sports drinks containing electrolytes; Sports drinks, namely, performance drinks; Sports drinks, namely, recovery drinks; Spring water; Stout; Syrups for lemonade; Syrups for making soft drinks; Syrups for making whey-based beverages; Syrups used in the preparation of soft drinks; Table waters; Tonic water; Vegetable juices; Wheat beer | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |