USPTO serial 87298039
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Shenzhen, CN
Shenzhen, CN
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Analysis for oil-field exploitation; Authenticating coins; Biochemical research and development; Calibration; Cloud seeding; Computer programming and rental of computer programs; Computer rental; Computer software installation and maintenance; Computer system analysis; Computer technology consultancy; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; Consulting services in the field of mining exploration; Creation of control programs for automated measurement, assembly, adjustment, and related visualisation; Design and development of computer game software and virtual reality software; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Design and development of computers and programs for computers; Design of mechanical and micromechanical components; Design sketching of packaging, containers, dinnerware and table utensils; Design, development and implementation of software; Design, development, installation and maintenance of computer software; Designing of machines, apparatus, instruments or systems composed of such machines, apparatus and instruments; Developing and updating computer software; Developing programs for simulating experiments or series of experiments in a virtual optical laboratory; Development of pharmaceutical preparations and medicines; Drafting and development of photovoltaic systems; Graphic illustration services for others; Hydrologic engineering services; Industrial and graphic art design; Inspection of oil fields; Measuring television audience size and composition for others via electronic data collection; Meteorological information; Oil-well testing; Outsource service provider in the field of information technology consulting; Outsource service providers in the field of information technology; Preparation, update, installation and maintenance of computer software; Providing a website featuring information about investigational medical devices, diagnostics and drugs; Providing search engines for the internet; Provision of scientific information, advice and consultancy in relation to carbon offsetting; Rental and maintenance of computer software; Rental of computer hardware and computer peripherals; Rental of computer software, data processing equipment and computer peripheral devices; Rental of computers relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; Telecommunications technology consultancy; Testing or research on civil engineering; Testing or research on electricity; Testing or research on prevention of pollution; Testing, inspection or research on agriculture, livestock breeding or fisheries; Updating and rental of software for data processing | ACTIVE | Apr 21, 2018 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |