USPTO serial 87299469
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Detroit, MI
Los Angeles, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Liquid nutritional supplement in oil used in the preparation of nutritionally fortified beverages or broths, medicinal oils used in the preparation of nutritionally fortified beverages or broths; powdered nutritional supplement concentrate used in the preparation of nutritionally fortified beverages or broths | ACTIVE | Jan 4, 2019 |
| 020 | Works of art of wood, wood composite, works of art of wax, plaster or plastic | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 2018 |
| 029 | Plant-based snack foods in the nature of fruit and soy based snack food; vegetable-based snack foods; algae-based snack foods in the nature of processed, edible seaweed, cyanobacteria or micro-algae; edible oils used in the preparation of nutritionally fortified beverages or broths; algae food beverages, namely, seaweed drinks and drinks containing micro-algae, aquatic plants or cyanobacteria; foods made with algae, micro-algae, blue-green algae, duckweed, aquatic plants or seaweed, namely, ready-to-eat foods and snack foods in the nature of processed algae for human consumption; vegan and plant-based composite food products with multiple ingredients, namely, ready-to-eat foods and snack foods in the nature of fruit and soy based snack food, vegetable-based snack foods, processed algae for human consumption; low-sugar, high protein composite foods with multiple ingredients, namely, plant-based and algae-based food products in the nature of processed algae for human consumption; works of art of composite foods with multiple ingredients, namely, plant-based and algae-based food products in the nature of processed micro-algae for human consumption | ACTIVE | Nov 28, 2017 |
| 030 | Vegan and plant-based composite food products with multiple ingredients, namely, ready-to-eat foods and snack foods in the nature of corn-based snack foods, rice-based snack food; food flavorings, other than essential oils, namely, food flavorings prepared from plant-based and algae-based food products; food flavorings, other than essential oils, namely, food flavorings prepared from artificial and natural flavor chemicals; plant-based snack foods in the nature of corn-based snack foods, rice-based snack food; condiments for addition to foods and beverages, namely, artificial chocolate; works of art of artificial chocolate; works of art of artificial honey; works of art of plant-based and algae-based snack foods in the nature of corn-based snack foods, rice-based snack food; works of art of food flavorings, other than essential oils, namely, food flavorings prepared from artificial and natural flavor chemicals; chocolate substitutes; honey substitutes | ACTIVE | Nov 28, 2017 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |