Drawing for WHITES

USPTO serial 87311893

WHITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin G. Smith

KEVIN G. SMITH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; cosmetic creams; perfumes; cosmetic masks; moustache wax; nail care preparations; oils for cosmetic purposes; petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; shampoos; shaving soap; cosmetic preparations; skin whitening creams; foot smoothing stones; Non-medicated cosmetic soap; smoothing preparations, namely, laundry starch; deodorant soap; antiperspirant soap; sunscreen preparations; cosmetic suntanning preparations; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; nail polishACTIVE
035Business management; business administration services; advertising services; demonstration of goods; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes in the nature of providing television home shopping services in the field of general consumer merchandise; dissemination of advertising matter; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 14, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 14, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 29, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 29, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 29, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance