USPTO serial 87328482
FERNETIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2021
- Examiner
- JACKSON, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FERNETIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.r.l.
MILANO, IT
Other trademarks owned by FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.r.l.
FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.r.l.
MILANO, IT
Other trademarks owned by FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.r.l.
FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.P.A.
MILANO, IT
Other trademarks owned by FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.P.A.
FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.r.l.
MILANO, IT
Other trademarks owned by FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.r.l.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus
Jeffrey B. Sladkus The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aerated water; Aloe vera drinks; Aperitifs, non-alcoholic; Beer wort; Cider, non-alcoholic; Cocktails, non-alcoholic; Essences used in the preparation of liqueurs; Essences for making non-alcoholic beverages; Fruit beverages; Fruit juices; Fruit nectars; Ginger ale; Grape must; Isotonic drinks; Kvass; Lemonades; Lithia water; Malt wort; Mineral water; Mineral and aerated waters; Must; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Powders for making soft drinks; Preparations for making beverages, namely, aerated water and mineral water; Sarsaparilla; Seltzer water; Sherbet beverages; Smoothies; Soda water; Syrups for beverages; Syrups for lemonade; Syrups for making beverages; Table waters; Tomato juice; Vegetable juices; Water beverages; Whey beverages; Extracts of hops for making beer; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic honey-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Anisette; Aperitifs; Arak; Brandy; Curacao; Kirsch; Liqueurs; Mead; Peppermint liqueurs; Perry; Piquette; Rice alcohol; Sake; Vermouth; Alcoholic bitters; Alcoholic essences; Alcoholic extracts; Alcoholic beverages containing fruit; Alcoholic beverages, namely, digestifs; Alcoholic fruit extracts; Hydromel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FRATELLI BRANCA DISTILLERIE S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named FERNETIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |