USPTO serial 87350393
LIFEPOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 2019
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with LIFEPOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SUDBURY, MA, US
BOSTON, MA, US
BOSTON, MA, US
BOSTON, MA, US
San Diego, CA
BOSTON, MA, US
COMMONWEALTH CARE ALLIANCE INC.
BOSTON, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott M. Soloway
Scott M. Soloway Soloway Schwartz LLC47 Sherburn CircleWeston, MA 02493United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Voice command and recognition software, and voice-enabled software applications for use in enabling caregivers to monitor and communicate with seniors and others needing assistance in order that they may live independently in their homes; wireless communications software for voice, audio and data transmission; wireless communication devices for voice-enabled software applications for voice, data or image transmissions; voice recognition and voice command software for customizing, enhancing and personalizing cloud-connected and voice-controlled software applications; software and hardware for contacting and transmitting emergency assistance services of any type; software and hardware for use in remote medical diagnostic and treatment services; software and hardware for controlling and interfacing with automatic medicine dispensers; computer hardware and software for interfacing with telemedicine software applications; software for monitoring, recording and measuring cognitive function in healthcare patients; wireless audio monitoring system consisting primarily of a network of microphones for monitoring, recording and transmitting sound of in-home patients to remote locations; computer software for mobile phones, tablets and other wireless devices, namely, software for use in monitoring safety of patients in a healthcare setting and recording and transmitting sound and speech recordings to remote locations; voice-controlled audio speakers; audio speakers for audibly communicating to other voice command and recognition devices and software applications; personal assistant software for use in and with a voice-enabled virtual caregiver which is configured and controlled by a person other than the senior or other needing assistance in their home for providing check-ins, reminders or voice services and for transmission of voice and data in order to communicate with the user; personal companion software for cognitive stimulation, simulated social interaction and cognitive functional monitoring of medical and other patients; computer software used for controlling voice accessible information and personal assistant and companion devices; software and hardware for interfacing with cloud-connected and voice-controlled smart consumer electronic devices and telemedicine software applications; stand-alone voice controlled information devices, namely, cloud- connected and voice-controlled smart audio speakers with virtual personal assistant capabilities; home automation and home device integration software for use in initiating reminders for seniors and others needing assistance through a two-way dialog, and for use in monitoring, through internal and external sensors, their health and mental acuity and detecting falls, and for use in interfacing with off the shelf home automation and telehealth devices; stand-alone voice controlled personal simulated companionship device consisting of cloud- connected and voice-controlled smart audio speakers for integrating services provided via apps; wireless audio monitoring system consisting primarily of a network of distributed indoor microphones for monitoring, recording and transmitting sound and speech to remote locations, computers and devices | ACTIVE | Jul 23, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARTEMIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFEPOD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFEPOD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFEPOD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NewSpeak Labs Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by VOICE CARE TECH HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COMMONWEALTH CARE ALLIANCE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LIFEPOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 19, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |