USPTO serial 87359803
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Palo Alto, CA
Menlo Park, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia L. Cotton
Patricia L. Cotton PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102-8500UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer software development, including development of developer software platforms, software accessed over networks such as the Internet, and downloadable software such as mobile applications, all in the fields of artificial intelligence, robotics, natural language processors, algorithms, machine learning technology, and case based reasoning technology; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software accessed over computer networks, namely, developer software platforms and software that enable computers to replicate human brain functions in the nature of learning, information visualization, consequence prediction, problem diagnosing, information classification, problem simulation, problem solving, planning and decision-making, case-based reasoning, mode knowledge production, knowledge-intensive computer application and software solution creation, knowledge discovery, decision processing, data analysis, knowledge management, and reporting, in order to facilitate computer control of other systems, devices, sensors, language processors, memory applications, application programming interfaces, educational apparatus, and teaching apparatus, including robots, to facilitate the creation of computerized personal digital data assistants, and to facilitate the creation of cognitive, social and emotional software modules and other artificially intelligent software technologies for human-like interaction, all for use in the fields of artificial intelligence, robotics, natural language processors, computer algorithms, machine learning technology, and case based reasoning technology | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 1, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |