USPTO serial 87360601
MASTERBREW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTERBREW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Wine, beer and bar accessories, namely, corkscrews, cocktail shakers, beverage glassware, cups, decanters, pitchers, insulated drinking vessels, beer glasses, beer mugs, beer pitchers, beer steins, beer tankards, beverage stirrers, bottle openers, bottle stands, bowls made of glass, ceramics and plastic, ceramic jugs, ceramic mugs, champagne buckets, champagne flutes, cocktail picks, shot glasses, containers for ice, bottle gourds, brandy snifters, drinking flasks, drinking glasses, drinking horns, drinking steins, drinking straw dispensers, drinking straw holders, drinking straws, drinking troughs, drinking vessels, highball glasses, hip flasks, liqueur glasses, liqueur sets comprised of glasses and a decanter, liquor pourers, margarita glasses, martini glasses, pint glasses, vodka glasses, wheat beer glasses, whisky decanters, whisky glasses, wine bottle cradles, wine buckets, non-electric wine coolers, wine decanters, wine drip collars specially adapted for use around the top of wine bottles to stop drips, wine glasses, wine jugs, wine openers, wine pourers; bakeware, cutting boards; tabletop candy boxes; candy dishes; candy bowls; bowls for serving nuts and pretzels; jugs; mugs; cruets, cruet sets for oil and vinegar sold empty, cruet stands for oil and vinegar; napkin holders, napkin rings; pizza stones; plaques of porcelain, ceramic, earthenware or glass; stands for dishes; stemware; stemware holders; storage jars; storage jars of glass; salt and pepper containers and shakers; plastic cups; plastic jugs; glass, ceramic, plastic, stainless steel and aluminum water bottles sold empty; insulated jars; insulating flasks; Vacuum pumps for wine bottles; Cold packs for chilling alcoholic beverage bottles; Pouring spouts for household use; Bottle stoppers specially adapted for use with wine bottles; Plastic identification tags for alcoholic beverage bottles and beverage glassware; Coasters, not of paper or textile; cheese cutting boards; Thermal insulated bags for alcoholic beverage bottles; Beverageware; Household utensils, namely, strainers; Wine drip collars specially adapted for use around the top of wine bottles to stop drips; coolers for beer; Portable beverage dispensers; Non-electric, pour-over coffee filters not of paper for brewing coffee; Cookware, namely, pots, pans, skillets and baking dishes; Cooking utensils, namely, wire baskets, barbecue branders, batter dispensers, grills and grill covers; Household containers for foods; Table place card holders not of precious metal; cookie jars; Drinking vessels; pots; Plastic buckets; Kettles, non-electric; Plastic storage containers for household or domestic use; double wall cups and water bottles, sold empty; wine bottles, sold empty; insulating sleeve holders for holding beverage cans; insulating sleeve holders for holding beverage cups; insulating sleeve holders for holding bottles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 10, 2019 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| May 9, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |