USPTO serial 87364636
MODELING DOUGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAH, RUPALI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODELING DOUGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys and games, namely, colored modeling clay compound; Toys, namely, apparatus utensils, tools and playsets for molding, shaping, extruding, working with, and playing games with molding compound, comprising, shape cutters and stamps, line cutters and stamps, scissors, knives, utility molding knives, molds in the nature of book molds and extrusion molds and apparatus, rolling pins, forceps, playmats; playsets for playing games with characters and objects modeled from the clay compound, comprising dolls and other three-dimensional characters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |