USPTO serial 87364977
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Astringents for cosmetic use, cologne, body spray, cotton for cosmetic use, lipstick, wax for depilation, false eyelashes, cosmetics, cosmetic creams, decorative decals for cosmetic use, nail polish, massage gels, eyebrow pencils, pencils for cosmetic use, hair lotions, lotions for cosmetic use, after shave lotions, makeup for the face, lavender oil, oils for cosmetic purposes, perfume, face powder, ointments for cosmetic use, soaps, dry shampoo, shampoo. conditioner, acetone polish remover, intimate hygiene wash, artificial fingernails, artificial nail glue, non-medicated skin cleansing and moisturizing products, makeup remover, henna, cosmetics for eyebrows, nail care products, depilatory products, bleaching products for cosmetic use, essential oils, rose oil, almond oil, jasmine oil, beauty masks, bergamot oil, eye shadows, skin lightening creams, makeup removal wipes, and eyelash adhesive | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |