USPTO serial 87366517
VALOREM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2017
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VALOREM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kansas City, MO
Kansas City, MO
Kansas City, MO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | value-added reseller services, namely, distributorship services featuring computer software; providing business intelligence services; business consulting services relating to the integration of the areas of business process technology; business consulting services, namely, assessment, analysis, and implementation of options to enhance customer experiences; business management services in the nature of project management for others; business process improvement consulting services; Business data analysis consultation; business consulting in the field of data integration | ACTIVE | Jun 17, 2009 |
| 042 | information technology consulting services; design, development and implementation of software; design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of computer software; data migration services and consultation; providing professional services, namely, consulting in the field of information technology project management and consulting in the fields of selection, implementation, and use of information technology solutions, systems, and processes for others; consulting in the field of IT project management; Planning, design and implementation of computer technologies for others, namely, assisting businesses to identify, analyze, and implement technology solutions, systems, and processes | ACTIVE | Jun 17, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |