Drawing for CLASSIC FOAM MATTRESS

USPTO serial 87367184

CLASSIC FOAM MATTRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, AHSEN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASSIC FOAM MATTRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

Jess M. Collen Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Mattresses; mattress toppers; beds; mattress foundation; bed frame parts, namely, bed slats; box springs; pillows; adjustable bedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 28, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 25, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2022GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2022GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2022CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 7, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 3, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 21, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 8, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 3, 2018GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 3, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance