USPTO serial 87367435
SHAFFERTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHAFFERTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technological consultation in the technology field of computer science and data recovery and management; Business technology software consultation services; Computer technology consultancy; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Computer services, namely, remote management of information technology (IT) systems of others comprised of remote desktop services for Unix, Linux, OSX, and Windows OS; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Consulting in the field of information technology; Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; Development and implementation of software, hardware and technology solutions for the purpose of productization of electronic components and electronic systems; Electronic signature verification services using technology to authenticate user identity; Information technology consulting services; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Providing technology consulting in the field of social media; Providing a members-only website featuring technology which provides members with the ability to remotely host data to specified users remotely; Providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows encrypted FTP and user portals; Providing a secured-access, members only website featuring technology that gives members the ability to manage payments and file transfer options for remotely stored content; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to share documents, images and videos; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to access stored files and partitions of purchased drive space; Providing a website featuring technology that enables subscribers to transfer files to and from a file transfer protocol server; Providing a website that features technology that enables the secure exchange of information by users; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to upload, download, share and sell custom and branded digital publications; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to access stored files and partitions of purchased drive space; Providing an on-line network environment that features technology that enables users to share data; Telecommunications technology consultancy | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |