USPTO serial 87369705
SHO CUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHO CUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Fitted covers for children's car seats; Canopies for children's car seats; Canopies for baby strollers; covers for baby strollers; Safety seats for infants and children for vehicles; baby strollers; fitted covers for shopping carts, namely, fabric slipcover designed to cover the entire child seating area of a shopping cart; vehicle windshield sunshades; vehicle window shades; shoulder belt pads, namely, fitted padded fabric covers for vehicle seat belt; vehicle seat cushions; vehicle accessories, namely, organizers adapted for fitting in a vehicle in the nature of car organizer bags, nets and trays specially adapted for fitting in vehicles; mirrors for vehicles, namely, rear view baby mirrors; Cloth baby bibs; Fabric baby bibs; bibs, not of paper; Baby clothing; babies' pants; bandanas; baby footwear; baby shoes; baby socks; baby headgear; baby hats; leggings; leggings; leg warmers; mittens; muffs; neckties; outer clothing; overalls/smocks; overcoats/topcoats; pants/drawers; pockets for clothing; ponchos; pullovers/jumpers; pyjamas/pajamas; scarves/scarfs; shawls; shirt yokes; shirt fronts; shirts; short-sleeve shirts; singlets/sports jerseys; ski gloves; skirts; skorts; sleep masks; slips; sock suspenders; socks; spats/gaiters; stocking suspenders; stockings; sweat-absorbent stockings; stuff jackets; suits; suspenders/braces for clothing; sweaters; teddies; tee-shirts; tights; Footwear, namely, bath sandals, bath slippers, beach shoes, boot uppers, boots, boots for sports, esparto shoes or sandals, fittings of metal for footwear, football shoes/football boots, footwear uppers, galoshes/goloshes, gymnastic shoes, half-boots, heel-pieces for footwear, heels, inner soles, lace boots, non-slipping devices for footwear, sandals, shoes, ski boots, slippers, soles for footwear, sports shoes, studs for football boots, tips for footwear, welts for footwear, wooden shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |