Drawing for BIG D'S

USPTO serial 87372735

BIG D'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CALLOWAY, CHRISTINA DENISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIG D'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan M. Kindred

ALAN M. KINDRED LEECH TISHMAN FUSCALDO & LAMPL, INC.200 S Los Robles AvenueSuite 210Pasadena, CA 91101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurants not including pizza parlors; Restaurant and catering services not including pizza parlor services; Restaurant services not including pizza parlor services; Restaurant services featuring hamburgers, burgers, fries, hotdogs, fish and chips, sandwiches, chicken, hot wings, vegetables, extras, in particular, peppers, eggs, avocado slices, mushrooms, jalopenos, chili, bacon and Louisiana Hotlinks, sides, salads, food for kids, and drinks; Restaurants not including pizza parlors; Provision of food and drink in restaurants not including pizzasACTIVEJul 6, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 3, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 6, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 2, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 2, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 10, 2017LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Mar 22, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Mar 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 18, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance