USPTO serial 87375708
CROSSBAR RETHINK WITH RERAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROSSBAR RETHINK WITH RERAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lucas S. Michels
Lucas S. Michels AMPACC Law Group, PLLC6100 219th Street S.W., Suite 580Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, namely, integrated circuits, microprocessors, microprocessor cores, memory circuits, memory chips, and user manuals, informational sheets, brochures and development manuals relating to the same and sold as a unit with said goods; semiconductors, semiconductor processors, semiconductor processor chips, semiconductor memory devices, integrated circuits, integrated circuit chips, microprocessors, microprocessor cores, printed circuit boards, multimedia accelerators, micro controllers, memory circuits, memory chips, and user manuals, informational sheets, brochures and development manuals relating to the same and sold as a unit with said goods; memory circuit designs, namely, integrated circuit memory and memory controller layouts recorded on computer media, memory circuit design software, computer software for designing integrated circuits, and user manuals, informational sheets, brochures and development manuals relating to the same and sold as a unit with said goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property, technical know-how, designs, computer software, computer hardware, integrated circuits and computer memory devices, all relating to material use and limits, assembly, design, access methods and manufacturing processes for semiconductors, semiconductor processors, semiconductor processor chips, semiconductor memory devices, integrated circuits, integrated circuit chips, microprocessors, microprocessor cores, printed circuit boards, multimedia accelerators, micro controllers, memory circuits and memory chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crossbar, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Crossbar, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CROSSBAR RETHINK WITH RERAM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2017 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |