Drawing for WELDED COTTON

USPTO serial 87379277

WELDED COTTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STEDMAN, CORI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WELDED COTTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander JSW Johnson

ALEXANDER JSW JOHNSON HAMILTON IP LAW, PC2322 E Kimberly Rd235WDAVENPORT, IA 52807

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Manufacturing services for others in the field of raw materials, made in whole or significant part of cotton, for use in textiles, fabrics, clothing, and threading; Manufacturing services for others in the field of raw materials made of textiles, containing cotton in whole or significant part, for use as non-textile materials and componentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 21, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 25, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 25, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2017CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Jun 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 20, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jun 20, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jun 20, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jun 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 24, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance