USPTO serial 87400018
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
CONNIE L. ELLERBACH FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETSILICON VALLEY CENTERMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and peripherals; microcontrollers, electronic sensors for measuring heat, humidity, moisture, vibration, speed, item counts, and related physical data generated within a physical environment, impact sensors, distance sensors, downloadable computer software for deploying, provisioning and managing virtual machines; computer software to manage software applications deployed on mobile devices, military drones, civilian drones, camera drones, and the internet of things (IOT); downloadable computer software for use in provisioning, developing, and managing software for computers, microcontrollers, electronic sensors, impact sensors, distance sensors, virtual machines, and cloud computing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for managing and ensuring the functionality of software applications deployed on mobile devices, military drones, civilian drones, camera drones, and the internet of things (IOT); technical support services, namely, troubleshooting computer hardware and software, reproducing errors in such products and determining approaches to remediate technical issues; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in provisioning, developing, and managing software for computers, microcontrollers, electronic sensors, impact sensors, distance sensors, virtual machines, and cloud resources; consultation services regarding software and providing temporary use of a non-downloadable web application for use in provisioning, developing, and managing software for computers, microcontrollers, electronic sensors, impact sensors, distance sensors, virtual machines, and cloud resources | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 31, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |