USPTO serial 87405233
ALL NATURAL 100% REAL CALLINECTES CRAB FROM NORTH AMERICA GOURMET CRABMEAT PASTEURIZED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALL NATURAL 100% REAL CALLINECTES CRAB FROM NORTH AMERICA GOURMET CRABMEAT PASTEURIZED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen G. Janoski
Stephen G. Janoski Stakeholder Brands, LLC900 Boucher AvenueAnnapolis, MD 21403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CRABMEAT | ACTIVE | May 31, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |