USPTO serial 87405742
MOBILITY LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOBILITY LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LUXEMBOURG, LU
LUXEMBOURG, LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
JEFFREY H. GREGER HAUPTMAN HAM, LLP2318 MILL ROADSUITE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus other than for medical purposes, namely, photographic life-saving apparatus and instruments, namely, optical mirrors, cameras, LCD projectors, laser measuring systems, compasses for measuring, surveying compass needles, cameras, signal processors; apparatus and instruments for the supply, distribution, transformation, accumulation, regulation or control of electric current; electric power supplies; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; blank magnetic data carriers, recording discs, and optical discs, namely, blank record disks, blank recordable optical discs; data processing equipment and computers; blank floppy computer discs, recorded computer software programs for application and database integration, for encryption, for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs; peripheral devices for computers; downloadable computer software programs for application and database integration, for encryption, for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs; computer operating programs, recorded; mouse data processing equipment; computer mouse mats; scanners; juke boxes for computers; intercommunication apparatus, namely, telephones, intercoms; interfaces for computers; readers, namely, optical disk readers, RFID readers, smart card readers; disk drives, namely, computer disc drives, digital disc drives; monitors, namely, computer monitors; computer printers for printing documents; computer memories; integrated circuit chips; magnetic data media, namely, typeface fonts recorded on magnetic media; facsimile machines; transmitters, namely, telephone transmitters, transmitters of electronic signals, radio transmitters; magnetic tape units, namely, magnetic-tape recorders, magnetic-tape drives; electric batteries; inspection mirrors; blank smart cards; cards with microprocessors for computers, namely, wireless cards; safety tarpaulins; laptop carrying cases; and all the foregoing excluding for uses in the field of medicine or medical research, the field of measuring human movement, gait and balance, and excluding medical research systems comprising wearable devices with sensors, namely, accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers, to monitor the physical movements of an individual wearing the device and computer software and monitors used during the process of monitoring the movement of an individual | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |