USPTO serial 87411496
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heena N Kampani
HEENA N KAMPANI LAW OFFICE OF HEENA N. KAMPANISUITE 670A 5675 JIMMY CARTER BLVDSUITE 670ANORCROSS, GA 30071| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish, not live; poultry; game; meat extracts; preserved fruits; dried fruits; cooked fruits; preserved vegetables; dried vegetables; cooked vegetables; jellies; jams; compotes; eggs; milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ices milk, and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |