Drawing for LEAN

USPTO serial 87429777

LEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Albert Carrion

Albert Carrion HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP111 CONGRESSSUITE 1400AUSTIN, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing and maintaining applications, software, websites and databases in the fields of customer relations management and claims management excluding marketing servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 12, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 12, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 12, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 20, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 20, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 20, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 18, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 16, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 16, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 16, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2018ISMRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST
Jul 23, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 23, 2018PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED
Jul 23, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jun 7, 2018ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST
Jun 5, 2018EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2018EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2018TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 16, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 28, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 26, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
May 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 2, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance