USPTO serial 87439910
LAZIZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAZIZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEENA KAMPANI
HEENA KAMPANI LAW OFFICE OF HEENA N KAMPANI5675 JIMMY CARTER BLVD 670ANORCROSS, GA 30071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; tea; sugar; cocoa; rice; yerba mate; flour; bread; cakes; frozen confectionery; baking powder; cocoa-based beverages; coffee-based beverages; chips made of cereal and corn; ices; ice; ice cream; honey; treacle; pomegranate molasses; salt; mustard; pepper; vinegar; sauces as condiments; ketchup; mayonnaise; processed thyme; chocolate; biscuits; candy; chewing gum; Turkish delight; halvah | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | Live animals; malt for brewing and distilling | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Mineral waters; aerated waters; fruit juices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Adeeb Derawan Sons' Company (Al Marai)
- Other trademarks owned by Adeeb Derawan Sons' Company (Al Marai)
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named LAZIZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |