USPTO serial 87439987
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erin R. Ogden
ERIN R. OGDEN OGDENGLAZER, LLC505 S ROSA RD #225PO BOX 45116MADISON, WI 53744| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Downloadable electronic books in the field of business and investing | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | (Based on Intent to Use) Printed books in the field of business and investing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring business and investing; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable articles in the field of business and investing | ACTIVE | Sep 29, 2016 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2019 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |