USPTO serial 87448439
TECHCLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHCLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirk A. Damman
KIRK A DAMMAN LEWIS RICE LLC600 WASHINGTON AVENUESUITE 2500ST LOUIS, MO 63101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical Support services, namely, providing data center infrastructure management in the cloud for third-parties for monitoring, administration and management of voice, security, emergency call systems, clocks and temperature monitoring in cloud computing IT and application systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |