USPTO serial 87468051
XTR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 20, 2021
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with XTR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,544*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KRUGER PACKAGING HOLDINGS L.P.
MONTREAL (QUEBEC), CA
KRUGER PACKAGING HOLDINGS L.P.
MONTREAL (QUEBEC), CA
KRUGER PACKAGING HOLDINGS L.P.
MONTREAL (QUEBEC), CA
Montreal, PQ, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Garfield Goodrum
Garfield Goodrum GARFIELD GOODRUM, PLLC7 Allen St., Suite 302Hanover, NH 03755UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | (Based on use) Paper for packaging and wrapping; corrugated packaging, namely, corrugated boxes, board, wrapping paper; industrial packaging containers of paper; paper boxes; linerboard for corrugated cardboard; point of purchase displays made of paper; hanging file folders; white top linerboard for boxes, board and wrapping paper; saturating paper; paper coreboard; corrugated medium, namely, fluting paper; (Based on 44e) Paper for packaging and wrapping; corrugated packaging, namely, corrugated boxes, board, wrapping paper; industrial packaging containers of paper; paper boxes; linerboard for corrugated cardboard; point of purchase displays made of paper; hanging file folders; white top linerboard for boxes, board and wrapping paper; saturating paper; paper coreboard; corrugated medium, namely, fluting paper | ACTIVE | May 17, 2017 |
| 017 | (Based on 44e) Recycled board building envelop, namely, insulating materials made of recycled cardboard | ACTIVE | May 17, 2017 |
| 035 | (Based on 44e) Distribution, namely, distributorship services in the fields of packaging and wrapping materials, corrugated boxes for packaging, paperboard boxes for industrial packaging, retail product packaging, linerboard, point of purchase displays, hanging file folders | ACTIVE | May 17, 2017 |
| 039 | (Based on 44e) Distribution services, namely, delivery of packaging and wrapping materials, corrugated boxes for packaging, paperboard boxes for industrial packaging, retail product packaging, linerboard, point of purchase displays, hanging file folders | ACTIVE | May 17, 2017 |
| 040 | (Based on 44e) Custom manufacture of packaging and wrapping materials, corrugated boxes for packaging, paperboard boxes for industrial packaging, retail product packaging, linerboard, point of purchase displays, hanging file folders | ACTIVE | May 17, 2017 |
| 042 | (Based on 44e) Packaging design of packaging and wrapping materials, corrugated boxes for packaging, paperboard boxes for industrial packaging, retail product packaging, linerboard, point of purchase displays, hanging file folders; Graphic design services, namely, corrugated box graphic design | ACTIVE | May 17, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PACKAGING HOLDINGS L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PACKAGING HOLDINGS L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PACKAGING HOLDINGS L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Kruger Holdings L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XTR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |