USPTO serial 87470127
FAT MUSCLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAT MUSCLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cochrane, ALBERTA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Tactical protective motorcycle helmets; Tactical protective motorcycle riding vests; Motorcycle tactical armour, namely, body armour for leg and arm protection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |