Drawing for TEETHING CARE

USPTO serial 87476121

TEETHING CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYER, DAVID COREY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEETHING CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori S. Kozak

LORI S KOZAK FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DRIVEBUILDING 3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplements; Herbal supplements; Medical preparations for the treatment of teething pains; Medicinal herbal preparations; Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of teething pains; Natural dietary supplements for the treatment of teething painsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 30, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 10, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 17, 2018GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 17, 2018GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 17, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 10, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 10, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 10, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 10, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance