Drawing for PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 87486533

PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Speiss, III

Thomas J. Speiss, III BUCHALTER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1000 Wilshire Blvd.15 FloorLos Angeles, CA 90017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS) featuring software in the field of construction project managementABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2020MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2020ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 26, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 6, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 31, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance