CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SOULZ

USPTO serial 87503543

SOULZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADCLIFF, BRENT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOULZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael G. Kelber

MICHAEL G. KELBER NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLPTWO NORTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical transducers used for providing haptic sensory output; electric actuators used for providing haptic sensory output; Computer software, namely, software development tools for use in the creation of entertainment media, audio recordings, audiovisual recordings, and video games; Computer software for use in enabling wearable devices to provide haptic sensory output; wearable devices, namely, shoes, insoles, vests and headsets containing transducers for use in providing haptic sensory outputs, specifically adapted to watching audiovisual recordings, listening to music audio recordings or experiencing other entertainment, namely, watching televisionACTIVE—
019Modular floorboards containing transducers for use in providing haptic sensory output for video games, audiovisual recordings, audio recordings, and other entertainment experiencesACTIVE—
028Wearable devices, namely, shoes, insoles, vests and headsets containing transducers for use in providing haptic sensory outputs specifically adapted for playing video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance