USPTO serial 87505994
FYBR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FYBR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chesterfield, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janik Marcovici
JANIK MARCOVICI PERMAN & GREEN LLP99 HAWLEY LANESTRATFORD, CT 06614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PLATFORM AS A SERVICE FOR OTHERS VEHICLE PARKING ENTERPRISES IN THE FIELD OFRELATED TO REMOTE MONITORING AVAILABLILTY, OCCUPANCY, AND VIOLATION OF PARKING SPACES; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE FOR OTHERS PARKING ENTERPRISES IN THE FIELD OF REMOTE MONITORING AVAILABLILTY, OCCUPANCY, AND VIOLATION OF PARKING SPACES; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE CLOUD-BASED SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS PARKING ENTERPRISES FOR CONNECTING, OPERATING, AND MANAGING NETWORKED PARKING DEVICES IN THE FIELD OF REMOTE MONITORING AVAILABLILTY, OCCUPANCY, AND VIOLATION OF PARKING SPACES IN THE INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |