CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KATHRYN

USPTO serial 87526143

KATHRYN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KATHRYN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan G. Morton

JONATHAN G. MORTON Morton & Associates LLP246 West BroadwayNew York, NY 10013UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; make-up; eye make-up; eyeliners; blushers; lipsticks; hair lotions; soapsACTIVE—
020Divans; sofas; armchairs; beds; ottomans; tables; chairs; chaises longues; furniture; mirrors; picture framesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 17, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 2, 2019GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 2, 2019GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
May 2, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 1, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 25, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance