USPTO serial 87534082
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Stringham
JOHN C. STRINGHAM WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing a website portal for product specialists to rate, review and recommend products; providing a website portal for product specialists to provide information about consumer products to other product specialists; brand evaluating services; brand positioning services; Promoting the goods and services of others to the general public and to targeted groups of consumers by providing a website portal featuring product information, discount information and reviews and comments regarding such products; Promoting the goods and services of others to the general public and to targeted groups of consumers by providing a ranking system featuring knowledge and influence of skilled evaluators; Providing brand incentive programs and rewards for industry professionals and product specialists in the form of product offers, discounts, samples and insider knowledge applicable to their field of expertise; Providing a web-based system and on-line portal for users to promote their goods and services to targeted groups of consumers and gather consumer information | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing retail sales training to retail sales personnel via the internet and downloadable mobile applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for user to gather consumer information, manage consumer data, or to conduct product campaigns, product category campaigns, or informational campaigns; providing a web content hosting platform for users to gather consumer information, manage consumer data and to conduct product campaigns, product category campaigns, or informational campaigns; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for product specialists to rate, review and recommend products; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for product specialists to communicate with other product specialists; providing an online, non-downloadable marketing software platform for users to conduct product campaigns to targeted groups of consumers and gather consumer information; providing an online, non-downloadable marketing software platform for product specialists to gather product information and earn discount information | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |