USPTO serial 87534295
GREEN BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEDNARZ, DUSTIN THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREEN BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Piove Di Sacco(Padova), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Weltsch
KEITH A. WELTSCH SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & SCOTT, P.C.400 GARDEN CITY PLAZASUITE 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Cooling installations for water; air cooling apparatus; cooling evaporators; air dryers, namely, industrial dryers for dehumidifying air; dryers for the removal of water vapor from compressed air and gases; cooling units for industrial purposes; water heaters being apparatus; cooling installations for liquids; heat exchangers, other than parts of machines; electric cabinets used to control temperature and humidity of fluids in industrial processes; heating units for industrial purposes; fluid coolers; biogas chillers | ACTIVE | May 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |