USPTO serial 87559417
UNIVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WLODARCZYK, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNIVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy G. Ackermann
TIMOTHY G. ACKERMANN Ackermann Law FirmPO BOX 2384GRAPEVINE, TX 76099-2384UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in installing video surveillance products and solutions; downloadable computer programs for use in installing and operating video surveillance products and solutions, use in operating and managing camera and video systems, use in database management for use in the field of camera and security alarm systems, and use in digital data analysis for use in the field of camera and security alarm systems; downloadable software for the remote control and monitoring of alarm monitoring systems; hardware and software for the remote control and monitoring of alarm monitoring systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing remote internet access to video surveillance by users for security purposes; Providing users remote internet access to video from IP (Internet Protocol) surveillance cameras for security purposes; Providing remote internet access to storage and retrieval by users of video from IP (Internet Protocol) surveillance cameras for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Electronic monitoring and reporting of activity at monitored facility sites using computers and sensors for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Surveillance services; Monitoring of security alarm systems; Remote monitoring of security alarm systems; Video monitoring of physical facilities for security purposes; Security services, namely, monitoring security alarm systems, and providing notifications and announcements in response to suspicious or unwanted activity and providing reports regarding security patrols and security-related activity for facilities, offered in connection with the aforementioned services; monitoring of security alarm systems and electric theft prevention installations by a remote monitoring center, namely, theft alarms, fire alarms, and smoke detectors; Alarm response and verification services; Emergency response alarm monitoring services, namely, monitoring of alert devices by a remote monitoring center for the dispatch of emergency public health and security services and notification to third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Security Automation, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Security Automation, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named UNIVIEW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |