USPTO serial 87563767
MACRO MACRO ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MACRO MACRO ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MACRO ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY INC.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by MACRO ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY INC.
MACRO ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY INC.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by MACRO ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGG A. PARADISE
GREGG A. PARADISE LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP20 Commerce DriveCranford, NJ 07016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINERY FOR COOLING, NAMELY, AIR RINGS; BUBBLE STABILIZING SYSTEMS FEATURING MACHINERY FOR PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS; BUBBLE COLLAPSING SYSTEMS FEATURING MACHINERY FOR PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS; SIZING CAGES IN THE NATURE OF BASKETS USED TO STABILIZE THE BLOWN FILM BUBBLE IN FILM EXTRUSION SYSTEMS; PERFORATORS FOR EXTRUDED FILMS; MACHINERY IN THE NATURE OF PLASTIC FILM WINDERS AND SLITTERS FOR USE IN THE PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS; TUBE MAKING MACHINES FOR USE IN THE PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS; DIES FOR USE WITH MACHINES TOOLS; DIE CARTS IN THE NATURE OF DEVICES FOR CHANGING, TRANSPORTING, AND STORING DIES; PLASTIC EXTRUDING MACHINES AND SCREWS BEING MACHINE PARTS; MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, INTERNAL COOLERS AND COMPLETE BLOWN FILM EXTRUSION LINES FOR PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS; MACHINES, NAMELY, POLYMER FEEDERS FOR PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS; MACHINES, NAMELY, UNWINDERS FOR PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS; TARPAULIN MAKING MACHINES AND ROTATING TOWERS FOR PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS; BAG MAKING MACHINES; COMPLETE CAST FILM EXTRUSION LINES BEING MACHINES; MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFORE IN THE NATURE OF SEALERS, FOLDERS, GUSSETERS AND PLASTIC FILM CONVERTING MACHINERY FOR PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS; MACHINES, NAMELY, COOLING STATIONS, WEB HANDLING ROLLERS AND PLASTICS EXTRUDER SCREEN CHANGERS FOR PRODUCTION OF EXTRUDED FILMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MACRO ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MACRO ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MACRO MACRO ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |