USPTO serial 87569349
CIRUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIRUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Skale
ANDREW D SKALE MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND3580 CARMEL MOUNTAIN ROADSUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely, consumer strategy business consultation in the fields of operation of business specializing in the use of predictive analytic models to assess cybersecurity risks for the understanding and predicting of consumer actions; none of the foregoing being in relation to credit cards, debit cards, payment cards, automatic teller machines (ATMs), point of sale payment terminals, financial, banking and credit services, ATM services, electronic funds and currency transfer services, payment services, and computer hardware and software for carrying out the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cybersecurity threat assessment detection services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software using data warehousing, data mining and predictive modeling software for use in monitoring, risk scoring and alerting in the field of cybersecurity threat assessment; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software in the field of cybersecurity risk analysis for use in creating and implementing business decisions; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software application for use in monitoring, risk scoring and alerting in the field of cybersecurity threat assessment; computer security services for protecting data and information from unauthorized access, namely, providing predictive analytic solution services to facilitate customer risk assessment in the field of cybersecurity threat assessment; none of the foregoing being in relation to credit cards, debit cards, payment cards, automatic teller machines (ATMs), point of sale payment terminals, financial, banking and credit services, ATM services, electronic funds and currency transfer services, payment services, and computer hardware and software for carrying out the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Nevada Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Nevada Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CIRUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |