USPTO serial 87573155
UVIFY DRACO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALBO, AMANDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UVIFY DRACO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seoul, KR
GWANAK-GU, SEOUL, KR
GWANAK-GU, SEOUL, KR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in transmitting, streaming, viewing and downloading audio, video, digital media and audiovisual content from robotic aircrafts, robotic vehicles, remote control (RC) aircrafts other than toys, drones, unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned aircraft systems and related accessories; Audio-receivers and video-receivers; Cases especially made for photographic apparatus and instruments; Electric batteries; Remote video monitoring system comprised of a video camera, computer hardware, and computer software for recording and transmitting images to a remote location; Avionic sensor systems, namely, navigation systems; Computer software for managing control devices for aircraft; Remote controllers for controlling a drone; Computer programs for use in the operation of a drone; Mounted cameras and video cameras; Photography and videography equipment, namely, camera mounts, remote controls for cameras, camera batteries, camera battery chargers, camera cases and straps, electronic luminescent display panels; Accessories for drones, non-toy unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS), and non-toy unmanned aerial systems (UAS), namely, batteries, battery chargers, power supply adaptors, remote controls, wireless signal range extenders; Software for the configuration, operation, and maintenance of drones, non-toy unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS), and non-toy unmanned aerial systems (UAS) | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2017 |
| 012 | Civilian drones; camera drones, other than toys; drones; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Structural parts of aircraft, namely, airplane propellers and fuselages, aerodynamic wings; Joysticks for aircraft; Cases and straps for drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and unmanned aerial systems (UAS); Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UAS) comprised of drones and remote controls for drones, and remote control (RC) aircraft, other than toys, and related software and manuals therefor sold as a unit; Accessories for drones, non-toy unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS), and non-toy unmanned aerial systems (UAS), namely, propellers, propeller guards, landing systems, comprising landing gear for drones, non-toy unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS), and non-toy unmanned aerial systems (UAS) | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UVify Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by UVIFY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by UVIFY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named UVIFY DRACO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |