USPTO serial 87577147
WEDDING RESCUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEDDING RESCUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew L. Goldstein
Andrew L. Goldstein Freeborn & Peters LLP311 South Wacker DriveSuite 3000Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | SEWING KITS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising the goods and services of others; providing an online commercial information directory on the internet; administration of a membership program through which participants obtain discounts on goods and services in the field of event planning | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Event planning services, namely, providing access to vendor replacements and support for pre-planned event emergencies and providing assistance and a website related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |