USPTO serial 87581127
GROWRATIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROWRATIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Programmable electronic data acquisition and control apparatus for environmental monitoring, environmental control, energy management, plant irrigation, plant nutrient management, alarm monitoring and alarm event management within horticultural productions facilities, environmental monitoring and control products, namely, atmospheric sensors, soil sensors, power controls for HVAC equipment; power controls for accessories used in the grow room to grow the plants; Environmental monitoring and control products, namely, power controls for nutrient delivery accessories, water system accessories, fans, humidifiers, and dehumidifiers; Software for the management of lighting systems, horticultural sensors, plants, horticultural productions facilities, grow areas requiring specific monitoring and control within horticultural production facilities, compliance controls, historical sensors and plant data; Programmable electronic data acquisition and control apparatus with computer software that allow the sharing and transmission of data and information between those devices for the purposes of facilitating environmental monitoring and control in the horticultural field | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Horticultural growing systems, namely, light fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and implementation of programmable electronic data acquisition and control apparatus for environmental monitoring, environmental control, energy management, plant irrigation, plant nutrient management, alarm monitoring and alarm event management within horticultural production facilities; Horticultural consulting services, namely, design, layout, and setup of greenhouse, hydroponic or plant nurseries and the design and installation of lighting systems; Plant nutrient management and delivery services, namely, plant analysis; Development, testing, and application of plant nutrient programs; Computer services, namely, providing an internet site featuring non-downloadable software for the management and control of horticultural facilities, areas within those facilities, plants, customers, operations, sensor data, historical sensor data; Software as a service (SAAS) utilizing computer software for the management and control of horticultural facilities, areas within those facilities, plants, customers, operations, sensor data, historical sensor data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |