USPTO serial 87583156
QUENTIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALBO, AMANDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUENTIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery; Essential oils for personal use; Cosmetics and make-up; Eye make-up; Eyeliners; Blushers; Lipsticks; Hair lotions; Non-medicated soaps for hands, face and body | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather sold in bulk; leather, namely, leather laces, leather cases; trunks and suitcases; travelling cases; handbags; purses; wallets; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips; harness; saddlery | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Divans; sofas; armchairs; beds; ottomans; tables; chairs; chaises longues; furniture; mirrors; picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HDH TEXTILES AND MANUFACTURERS (PTY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named QUENTIN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |