CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PILLAR

USPTO serial 87625864

PILLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PILLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Polly A. Dinkel

POLLY A DINKEL SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLPONE EMBARCADERO CENTER22ND FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042User experience (UX), namely, computer software design in the field of user experience software; IT consulting services in the field of internet of things (IoT), autonomous vehicles, and smart city technologies; system architecture, namely, computer hardware and software design in the fields of agriculture, financial services, and public utilities design; computer software research and development and systems research and development, namely, research and design in the field of computer networking systems including for software and product testing; and application development, namely, development of software in the field of mobile applicationsACTIVEFeb 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 23, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 31, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 10, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 10, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 19, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 29, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 10, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 10, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 9, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance