USPTO serial 87657822
INFINITY LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, DONALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFINITY LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin D. Swindells
Justin D. Swindells NIXON PEABODY LLP70 W. MADISON STREET, SUITE 5200CHICAGO, IL 60602-4378UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Incubation services, namely, providing work space containing business equipment to freelancers, start-ups, existing businesses and non-profits | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Incubation services, namely, providing financing to freelancers, start-ups, existing businesses and non-profits; Think tank services in the nature of consultation services in the field of digital finance | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Think tank services in the nature of consultation services in the field of additive manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing on-line classes, seminars, meet-ups, and workshops in the fields of retail, software design, technology research and development, and customer service; Education services, namely, one-on-one mentoring in the field of retail technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the fields of smart cities and digital governments, industrial Internet of Things, additive manufacturing, enterprise mobility, pervasive computing, machine intelligence, cognitive computing, digital optics, mixed reality, block chain, digital finance, bio informatics, biometric identity systems, hyperimaging, artificial vision, cyber defense, digital forensics, neuromorphic chips, neural analytics, quantum computing, id3 algorithms, and cryptography; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools; Collaborative computer programming for others in the nature of hackathons; Think tank services, namely, providing new ideas and concepts for web-based applications for others; Think tank services in the nature of technical consultation services in the field of smart cities technologies and digital governments technologies, industrial Internet of Things, enterprise mobility technologies, pervasive computing, machine intelligence, cognitive computing, digital optics technologies, mixed reality, block chain, biometric identity systems, hyperimaging, artificial vision, cyber defense, digital forensics, neuromorphic chips, neural analytics, quantum computing, and cryptography; Platform as a service (PAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in research, design, and utilization of block chain software, robotic process automation, social networks, machine learning, Internet of Things, augmented reality, and advanced analytics; Computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings, and interactive discussions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UST Global (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by UST Global (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INFINITY LABS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | EXDA | EXPARTE APPEAL DISCLAIMER ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |