Drawing for O

USPTO serial 87664341

O

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with O?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. ROXANNE ELINGS

G. ROXANNE ELINGS DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1251 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10020

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Body massage apparatus and vibromassage apparatus, namely, electric vibrating massagers, electric vibrating body massagers, foot massagers; body therapeutic rehabilitation apparatus for therapeutic purposes, namely, mechanical and hydraulic multi cell massage mattress for medical purposes; therapeutic massagers and massage apparatus worn by user, namely, a massage apparatus featuring a band with adjustable straps worn on the arm, leg, or foot; adult sexual stimulation aids, namely, massagers, vibrators, stimulators, dual stimulators, triple stimulators, and accessories therefor, namely, harnesses straps being parts of and sold together with adult sexual stimulation aids, storage cases for the adult sexual stimulation aids, constriction rings for use in maintaining penis rigidity in men, straps being parts of and sold together with adult sexual stimulation aids, sex toysABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2022MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 17, 2022ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 17, 2022OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 17, 2022OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Nov 15, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 14, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 15, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 13, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 13, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 13, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 13, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 13, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 20, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 20, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 20, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 14, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED
Jul 14, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED
Jun 19, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 18, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 18, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 19, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 14, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 17, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 12, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jun 13, 2018GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED
Jun 13, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 13, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 8, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 2, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance