USPTO serial 87671692
CA COURTROOM ANIMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPALE, LISA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CA COURTROOM ANIMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redondo Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dimitry Lensky, Esq.
DIMITRY LENSKY, ESQ. GREENBERG, WHITCOMBE, TAKEUCHI, GIBSON & GRAYVER,21515 HAWTHORNE BLVD SUITE 450TORRANCE, CA 90503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software programs for use in litigation support, trial presentation, and trial preparation for courtroom presentation, trial exhibit management and display, database management, document editing and annotation, video editing, and linking of documents and exhibits to video presentations | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2016 |
| 016 | Educational services, namely, seminars, lectures and workshops in the field of legal education, courtroom techniques and continuing legal education for attorneys, and distributing course materials in conjunction therewith | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2016 |
| 042 | Design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of graphic design for use in legal support, namely, development of visual presentations for litigation; courtroom presentation technology; and litigation data management; Graphic illustration and drawing services, namely, development of visual presentation aids for use in litigation and at trial, and electronic editing and annotation of document or video evidence for use in litigation and at trial | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2016 |
| 045 | Litigation support service in the nature of courtroom trial presentation assistance services and strategic exhibit design and production | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by David Brubaker
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CA COURTROOM ANIMATION
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |