USPTO serial 87673900
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jae Youn Kim
JAE YOUN KIM NOVICK, KIM & LEE, PLLC3251 OLD LEE HIGHWAYSUITE 404FAIRFAX, VA 22030| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Apparatus for making beer, namely, machines and machine tools for making beer; Machines for making beer; Apparatus for making craft beer, namely, machines and machine tools for making craft beer; Machines for making craft beer; Beer processing machines for industrial purpose; Craft beer processing machines for industrial purpose; Electric beer machine other than for household purpose; Electric craft beer machine other than for household purpose; Brewing machines for brewing beer; Brewing machines for brewing alcoholic beverages | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2017 |
| 032 | Beer, ale and lager; Beer, ale and porter; Beer, ale, lager, stout and porter; Wheat beer; Stout; Ale; Pale ale; Pilsner beer; black beer; Flavored beers; Low-alcohol beer; Malt beer; Beer-based cocktails; Imitation beer; Coffee-flavored beer; Coffee-flavored ale; Beer-based beverages being cocktails; Root beer; Beer wort; Malt wort | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2017 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |