USPTO serial 87677398
PLAY TO CODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DICKSON, RACHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAY TO CODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toy aircraft; Toy airplanes; Toy animals; Toy boats; Toy construction sets; Toy drones; Toy figures; Toy gliders; Toy houses; Toy mailboxes; Toy mobiles; Toy robots; Toy rockets; Toy scooters; Toy tools; Toy vehicles; Toy watches; Toys, namely, children's dress-up accessories; Action figure toys; Battery operated action toys; Children's activity tables containing manipulative toys which convert to easels; Children's educational toys for developing fine motor, oral language, numbers, counting, colors and alphabet skills sold in a fabric bag which has a clear vinyl window for viewing small trinkets and toys securely contained within the bag itself; Children's educational toys for developing coding and computational thinking skills, reading skills, math skills, science skills, emotional learning skills; Children's multiple activity toys sold as a unit with printed books; Construction toys; Educational toys for teaching math principles to children, namely, manipulative blocks for displaying patterns and groupings; Electric action toys; Electronic toy vehicles; Electronic action toys; Electronic learning toys; Electronic novelty toys, namely, toys that electronically record, play back, and distort or manipulate voices and sounds; Electronically operated toy motor vehicles; Interlocking construction toys; Mechanical toys; Plush toys; Plush toys with attached comfort blanket; Remote controls for toy vehicles, action figures, dolls, and electronic toy blocks; digital interactive games, namely, trays and tracks sold as a unit that allow the user to form software coding sentences by placing the blocks within the trays and tracks to run computer software sentences and commands, digital interactive games; Stacking toys; Talking toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |